Published on May 31, 2017 On May 30th I was attacked from behind by 3 Antifa activists on my way to a literature event in Edinburgh with political commentator David Scott. Police was informed and as you can see we posses photos of two of the overwhelmingly enthusiastic 'anarchists.'
Source: Lock the Gate Alliance Darling Downs farmers have scored a legal victory in their battle against New Hope Coal. This is a case of the Oakey Coal Action Alliance, EDO Queensland and the 30 other community members, taking their battle to save their farmland and their water to the courts – and winning! Congratulations are in order to those brave souls who never gave up and took their stand to court! And of course a big thank you to those who supported the cause for the farmers and community affected by this mine. I would think a big thank you is due to radio personality Alan Jones who has supported the people all along.
We read: “The Land Court judgement concluded that “The principles of intergenerational equity are breached.….with the potential for groundwater impacts to adversely affect landholders in the vicinity of the mine for hundreds of years to come”. “This is an extraordinarily strong and important outcome - but unfortunately it is not binding on the Queensland Government. It is only a recommendation for them to consider. And we’ve seen strong recommendations from the Land Court watered down by politicians before.”
I recently watched Mark Latham’s interview of Bernard Gaynor and his battles with the politically correct bureaucracy which is now before the Courts. (FOUND HERE: http://www.2gb.com/podcast/mark-latham-the-outsider-16/.(Bernard explained his SITUATION to us at the National 2014 Seminar)
I see Mark describes himself as from the mould of traditional Labor within the political spectrum of a ‘Social Democrat’. As Mark is being actively promoted by those who like to think of themselves as of ‘the conservative’ side of politics, I thought I should have a look at Mark’s background and try to determine just where he fits in to the political/media scheme of things.
Readers have commented on the article “The Institute of Historical Revisionism is Wrong, Wrong, Wrong” reminding me that while we are all individuals, ‘no man is an island unto himself’. We are social beings – and have always been social beings. Yes, of course that truth is recognised but the matter doesn’t end there. Christianity teaches us that we are to ‘Do unto others as you would have them do unto you’. * One can read in http://www.dictionary.com:
“This so-called golden rule is stated in just about every ancient writing about behavioural precepts (including the New Testament, Talmud, Koran, and the Analects of Confucius). Among the earliest appearances in English is Earl Rivers' translation of a saying of Socrates (Dictes and Sayenges of the Philosophirs, 1477): “Do to other as thou wouldst they should do to thee, and do to none other but as thou wouldst be done to.” It is so well known that it is often shortened".*A command based on words of Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount : “All things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them.” The Mosaic law contains a parallel commandment: “Whatever is hurtful to you, do not do to any other person”.”http://www.dictionary.com/browse/do-unto-others-as-you-would-have-them-do-unto-you
It was in March 2012 the Institute of Historical Revisionism (IHR) wrote of “America’s Great, Flawed Ideology of Individualism” (March 21, 2012). Since that time the situation has only got worse and the American people struggle even more. This has all been brought to mind by the recent newspaper headlines of the latest bombing in Manchester United Kingdom and the reported death of 29 teenagers in the bomb-blast. At the time (2012) the IHR wrote:
“America’s ever more obvious cultural disintegration and social paralysis, and its erosion of national identity and purpose, are not minor or temporary problems, but are symptoms of a deep-rooted social-political illness and a systemic failure of the country’s democratic-capitalist system. In large measure, this sickness is the predictable, inevitable consequence of America’s basic ideology of “pursuit of happiness” individualism. A guiding outlook that was useful, and perhaps even necessary, in an earlier age is now a liability. The ideology laid out in the US Declaration of Independence greatly encouraged this country’s astonishing dynamism, growth, inventiveness and prosperity, especially during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. But the core outlook that once contributed to this country’s development is incapable of sustaining a stable and healthy society. Especially in recent decades, America’s “pursuit of happiness” ideology has, inevitably and inexorably, been hastening our nation’s social-political dissolution and decline.”
Update: on May 18, C16 sailed through the Canadian Senate with no amendments.Senate hearing on Bill C16 - Jordan B. Peterson, 18 May 2017The following is an explanation from Jordan B. Peterson as to his testimony to the Canadian Senate’s Hearing on Bill C16:
I served as a witness at the Canadian Senate yesterday, regarding Bill C16, which adds the ill-defined categories of gender expression and gender identity to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination. The Federal government, in a website which has since been taken down, stated clearly that this legislation would be interpreted in keeping with the policies of the Ontario Human Rights Commission, which I regard as one of the most dangerous institutions in Canada, in relationship to all rights other than those of “equality,” including freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of association.The Bill Amends the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.I was partnered with lawyer Jared Brown, whose courageous and detailed analysis of Bill C16 can be found here: https://litigationguy.wordpress.com/2017/05/19/d-jared-brown-and-dr-jordan-b-peterson-testifying-before-the-senate-legal-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/ which amends the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.
The article in the Crossroads Blog “Bank operations and exposure needs addressing NOW!” from cairnsnews, Monday, 15 May 2017 featured a photo of a stack of hundred dollar notes . Accounting methods --- www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521914001434 The fact is the article was about banks having the power to create credit which, in my understanding, does not originate from the same source as does the hundred dollar notes.
But how would credit/debt blips on a computer be pictured in a text book on banking or in a newspaper on bank credit? If the picture accurately reflected the origin of credit it would have to simply show just how the fraud originates in bank’s ledgers as this site has done previously. In the 1990s Mr. Ray King of Booragoon, West Australia was asked to explain the ‘creation of credit’ for those who found the concept difficult to envisage. Photo of Mr. Ray King along with Frank Bawden and Roy Gustard http://www.alor.org/New%20Times/pdf/NT2818.pdf
The Church of the Servile State: “Every religion, apart from open devil worship, must appeal to a virtue or the pretence of a virtue. But a virtue, generally speaking, does some good to everybody. It is therefore necessary to distinguish among the people it was meant to benefit those whom it does benefit. Modern broad-mindedness benefits the rich; and benefits nobody else. It was meant to benefit the rich; and meant to benefit nobody else. And if you think this unwarranted, I will put before you one plain question.
There are some pleasures of the poor that may also mean profits for the rich: there are other pleasures of the poor which cannot mean profits for the rich? Watch this one contrast, and you will watch the whole creation of a careful slavery.
“It is not the straits to which the Church may be reduced, along with the rest of us, which disheartens us; united in faith we could endure and achieve anything. It is the ready accommodation to, even the anticipation of the will of Mammon, both on the parochial and on the World scale…”
“Hundreds of small country towns have been stripped of their official status”. Why? Because the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) “has updated a new statistical standard to define an urban centre locality, or town. Census data is applied to a formula that decrees centres with less than 200 people are no longer towns”. Why? Because Government financial policy is making it “too expensive to live in rural areas with attendant withdrawal of essential services”. - - the Weekly Times 27th December 2013
Not by Drought, nor by ‘Global Warming’ but by Crafty Usurers!AUSTRALIA... When the shearing sheds are silent and the stock camps fallen quiet When the gidgee coals no longer glow across the outback night And the bush is forced to hang a sign, ‘gone broke and won’t be back’ And spirits fear to find a way beyond the beaten track When harvesters stand derelict upon the wind swept plains And brave hearts pin their hopes no more on chance of loving rains When a hundred outback settlements are ghost towns overnight When we’ve lost the drive and heart we had to once more see us right When ‘Pioneer’ means a stereo and ‘Digger’ some backhoe And the ‘Outback’ is behind the house, there’s nowhere else to go And ‘Anzac’ is a biscuit brand and probably foreign owned And education really means brainwashed and neatly cloned When you have to bake a loaf of bread to make a decent crust And our heritage once enshrined in gold is crumbling to dust And old folk pay their camping fees on land for which they fought And fishing is a great escape; this is until you’re caught When you see our kids with yankee caps and resentment in their eyes And the soaring crime and hopeless hearts is no longer a surprise When the name of RM Williams is a yuppie clothing brand Not a product of our heritage that grew off the land When offering a hand makes people think you’ll amputate And two dogs meeting in the street is what you call a ‘Mate’ When ‘Political Correctness’ has replaced all common sense When you’re forced to see it their way, there’s no sitting on the fence Yes one day you might find yourself an outcast in this land Perhaps your heart will tell you then, ‘. I should have made a stand’ Just go and ask the farmers that should remove all doubt Then join the swelling ranks who say, ‘don’t sell Australia out’ - - Author unknown
We have featured the paper by Dr. Richard Werner and the power of banks to create money out of thin air, and interest has been stirred, but not all our readers are familiar with the discipline and its terminology in which the discussion is taking place. In the following, the wording has not been changed from the original but certain portions have been ‘cherry-picked’ in order to make clearer. Emphasis has been added throughout.
Abstract 1. Introduction Thanks to the recent banking crises interest has grown in the details of how banks operate. In recent decades, the empirical and institutional micro-structure of how banks operate had not been a primary focus of attention by investigators. This lack of interest may partly be due to the predominance of the hypothetico-deductive* research methodology in economics, which begins by posing axioms and assumptions. Such a theoretical and hypothetical framework has also been the basis for bank regulations. As is well known to historians, reality may be less logical and rational than the designers of theoretical constructs may envisage. This is known in other areas of finance, where market and investor behaviour often does not conform to the precepts of theoretically posed ‘rational agents’. By contrast, an inductive approach begins by establishing the empirical facts.
SIR, Ben Goldsmith (Letters, May 4) claims that climate policies are not pushing up energy bills. He obviously is not aware that, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility, subsidies for green energy will cost £9.1billion this year, and will rise to £14.3.billion by 2020. To that figure must be added £11 billion for the smart meter rollout. All of this must be paid for by consumers.
Mr. Goldsmith also claims that wind power, along with gas, is now the cheapest form of electricity. Could he explain why wind farms still require large subsidies, rather than competing on the open market? - - -Paul Homewood, Sheffield, South Yorkshire.
writes Andrew Bolt on his Blog 11 May 2017. The headline reminded me of an article Ivor Benson wrote as former Rhodesian Front prime minister Ian Smith was fading from the limelight of world history. (It is as well that we remember Marxist Robert Mugabe took over the leadership of that little nation now known as Zimbabwe – and is still in power as the Marxists brought the nation and its people to their knees.)
“How else are we to explain the dazed incomprehension with which the rank and file members of the Rhodesian Front, even members of parliament, even cabinet ministers, looked on as one by one all those ‘evil geniuses’ of whom Harold Wilson was later to speak, genuine opponents of the socialist world revolution, were defamed, tricked, driven out of the party, or in some other way deprived of any influence?”
Why would a government chartered by constitution to protect the people be so reluctant for a Royal Commission into Australian banking when overwhelming public evidence suggest a pungent smell of endemic criminal corruption is abundant reflects vested political interest from the parliament of Australia.
The current federal budget 2017 discussions you may find the attached paper of interest.
We thank Betty Luks of Australian League of Rights presenting this paper to sosnews for our readers to review quoting - International Review of Financial Analysis published by Elsevier Inc of this paper were invited to present a submission to the Iceland government in the aftermath of the Banking collapses.
Aren’t you tired beyond belief of government’s annual “ritualised sermons, ceremonies and main prayer” (as The Australian editorial, 9 May 2017 puts it) as Budget time has once more come upon us? The Editorial reads:
“Budget set to bank our future on better growth”“It has become a ritual. We know the sermons, ceremonies and the main prayer. We put ourselves through it and we always hope for better. But we know that almost certainly we will return to the same rites and promises a year later when, again, we will have fallen short of expectations. So we will offer a similar prayer for the year after that.”
While we may all be sick and tired of the ‘guff’ the mainstream media continuously feeds to us it is way past time we took on our own responsibility for the state of affairs this nation is now labouring under. This website has more than enough information-–along with some important historical facts—on why we are in such a financial mess.
So please, don’t whinge about the state of the nation if you are not going to play your part in its redemption. First, study carefully the historical background of the banking system and grasp clearly why the banking system has such control over our nation’s financial affairs.
Taken from the original “Story of the Commonwealth Bank” by F.J. Amos, 9th edition:Read the full story by F.J. Amos here….https://alor.org/Library/Amos%20DJ%20-%20Commonwealth%20Bank.pdf Mr. Amos writes:
“The Story of the Commonwealth Bank” was originally delivered as a lecture before the Sturt Electoral Committee, Adelaide, and was first printed in pamphlet form in 1931. It exhibited the usual defect of all lectures, namely, condensation of the subject matter to an extreme degree. The great and unexpected demand which arose for the pamphlet found me so closely occupied in other work that the second and third editions had to be printed practically unaltered, and I began to be more and more sensible of the need for amplifications and additions.
We can’t blame Goldmann Sachs. It’s just good business. Ref: http://joannenova.com.au/2017/05/goldmann-sachs-bigger-than-fossil-fuel-in-the-climate-debate/Goldmann Sachs pours money into lefty causes and politicians of both stripes. The gifts to left-wing flagships like climate change and same-sex marriage buy protection from the anti-bank Occupy crowd. And climate propaganda is doubly useful — Goldmann Sachs can invest and profit from government largess. And these are very big biccies – -in 2009 Goldmann Sachs announced it would spend $150 billion on green energy by 2020.
The message to non-left causes is that if you want to get multimillion dollar philanthropic funds, mobilize people and march in the street. When Goldmann is afraid of what you might do against their bonuses or profits they might get interested in your cause too.
Filming undercover in East Timor in 1993 I followed a landscape of crosses: great black crosses etched against the sky, crosses on peaks, crosses marching down the hillsides, crosses beside the road. They littered the earth and crowded the eye. The inscriptions on the crosses revealed the extinction of whole families, wiped out in the space of a year, a month, a day. Village after village stood as memorials.