https://www.spectator.com.au/2017/09/whats-changed-in-britain-since-same-sex-marriage/     Four years ago, amid much uncertainty, 400 British members of parliament voted to redefine marriage in the United Kingdom.  Then prime minister David Cameron announced that, despite having made no mention of the issue in his party’s pre-election manifesto, it would be MP’s who decided the fate of marriage.  Now, it’s Australia’s turn to choose. There’s one key difference. Unlike in Britain, it will be the people who decide.

     Everyone agrees, whether they admit it or not. This is a decision of enormous significance.  Therefore, it seems sensible to analyse the consequences of the potential change, within nations in which redefinition has previously been carried out. 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/programs/national-press-club/2017-09-13/national-press-club:-same-sex-marriage/8941880

Hello Lou,    Many thanks—this link brings up and plays the Press Club event immediately and I am grateful for the opportunity to view the discussion.  I think that Lyle Shelton and Karina Okotel conducted themselves with dignity and respectfully presented, with honesty, a number of entirely valid comments.  Of course, in final analysis no popular plebiscite, referendum or election will or can establish the rightness or wrongness of homosexuality, per se, in terms of Natural or Divine Law because that is something inherent in the laws of the Universe, which man did not create.  

       It's been a chaotic couple of days in the Senate and there's no sign of that changing this week!The usual argy-bargy over procedure and process continues but it is the legislative agenda that is worthy of comment.

     Specifically there are two bills that have failed the common sense test. The first of these is about 'protections' to make hurt feelings an offence during the debate on redefining marriage. This was rushed into the senate this morning and within hours passed with little critical examination - but with plenty of emotional and self-serving stories over how nasty the debate has been.Unlike most, I chose to question the government over some contents of the bill and frankly wasn’t satisfied with the answers.Firstly, it overturns the people's right to access the legal system by requiring their complaint to be first approved by the Attorney-General, who coincidentally is a cheerleader for the rainbow brigade.

     RT News, September 12, 2017  https://www.rt.com/op-edge/402588-google-eric-schmidt-republicans/

     Google has taken the unprecedented step of burying material, mostly from websites on the political right, that it has deemed to be inappropriate. The problem, however, is that the world’s largest search engine is a left-leaning company with an axe to grind.Let’s face it, deep down in our heart of hearts we knew the honeymoon wouldn’t last forever. Our willingness to place eternal faith in an earth-straddling company that oversees the largest collection of information ever assembled was doomed to end in a bitter divorce from the start. After all, each corporation, just like humans, has their own political proclivities, and Google is certainly no exception. But we aren’t talking about your average car company here.

BOOK REVIEW:  The Occidental Observer: “Dissident Dispatches” by Andrew Fraser:  London: Arktos, 2017

     “Andrew Fraser was for most of his career a professor of law at Macquarie University in Sydney. He was catapulted to prominence in July, 2005, by a letter to a local newspaper warning against the importation of Sudanese refugees into Australia: “Experience everywhere in the world shows us that an expanding black population is a sure-fire recipe for increases in crime, violence and other social problems.” The controversy surrounding the letter resulted in his departure from Macquarie.

Hurricane Irma formed over cooler water, 7th worst, but Climate Druids see fingerprints, tea leaves, crystals everywhereHurricane Irma is a big bad storm, like other big bad storms.

Six awkward facts:

Keeping You in the Loop     There is evidence to suggest that the last 20 years of temperature readings taken by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology, from hundreds of automatic weather stations spread across Australia, may be invalid. Why?  Because they have not been recorded consistent with calibration.

     Somewhat desperate to prove me wrong, late yesterday the Bureau issued a ‘Fast Facts’ that really just confirms the institution has mucked-up.   You can read my line-by-line response to this document here: http://jennifermarohasy.com/2017/09/bureau-management-rewrites-rules/

     It’s as if someone were out there making up pointless jobs just for the sake of keeping us all working.

     In the year 1930, John Maynard Keynes predicted that technology would have advanced sufficiently by century’s end that countries like Great Britain or the United States would achieve a 15-hour work week. There’s every reason to believe he was right. In technological terms, we are quite capable of this. And yet it didn’t happen. Instead, technology has been marshaled, if anything, to figure out ways to make us all work more. In order to achieve this, jobs have had to be created that are, effectively, pointless.

      “Instrument errors, noise, may account for a quarter to one half of our national warming trend in the last century".

     When the newspapers run a headline with Sydney hits, say, 44.4 degrees and that number gets engraved in history, who realizes that the extreme heat may have only lasted one second? You might think the maximum temperatures were above 44 for at least ten minutes, but the BOM will write it into the record books even if that heat lasts one second, and if the temperature a minute before was more than a whole degree cooler.

     “Frederick II of Prussia ascended the Throne in 1740.  He has fortunately left voluminous writings of which Political Testament of Frederick II ("the Great") (1752) is possibly the most important.  The language and sentiments of this work bear in many ways a striking resemblance to those of the so-called Protocols of Zion, and strengthen the belief that the source of the policy of both of them is Masonic.  Anarcharsis Clootz,** who called himself “the personal enemy of Jesus Christ,” was a close associate of Frederick, and was a high Freemason.

     The philosophy of Frederick, if it can be so described, is not in doubt.  He remarks:

https://thecross-roads.org/the-socialist-phenomenon Experiments in Co-Habitation      While some of these characteristics are certainly familiar enough from the example of Communism, others are lesser known. In the earliest days of the Soviet state, various experiments in cohabitation by men and women were permitted on the grounds that the family was a `bourgeois’ institution that should be superseded and allowed to die out. For a time at least, childbearing out of wedlock was encouraged on the grounds that children could be better brought-up in state-run institutions while mothers worked. These experiments so disordered a society already reeling under forcible collectivization, the imprisonment and mass-murder of ‘suspect’ classes, and economic collapse; that the Bolsheviks soon abandoned them.

     Far from being innovative, the origins of these ideas go back at least as far as Plato, and recur frequently throughout the history of utopian Socialism, as Shafarevich abundantly and cogently illustrates with examples drawn from a number of cultures widely separated in time and space.

I used to to think that if enough became motivated, that we might have a chance of democratically correcting this sort of anarchy, but we don't!

A deeper continuous study reveals that such thought is folly.

     Readers could find the review of world-renowned mathematician by profession, Igor Shafarevich’s book, “The Socialist Phenomenon”1 of great interest in light of the ‘revolution’ that is at present being played out in the western world.  The review was written in 2007. Igor Shafarevich died in 2017

     Igor Shafarevich’s book, first became widely known in the West when Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn mentioned it in his commencement address to Harvard University in 1978 A World Split Apart .

Source: Australian Christian Lobby      There is a school of thought in the debate about redefining marriage that it is inevitable and that Christians should just sue for peace with the same-sex marriage activists.  Try and extract as many protections for religious freedom as possible and roll over.To make it easier for us to capitulate, leading politicians such as Opposition Leader Bill Shorten, Attorney General George Brandis and Tim Wilson say same-sex marriage and freedom of religion can co-exist.  “I don’t accept the religious practice in this country is under threat,” Mr Shorten said this week.

     What he is essentially saying is it is okay to go to church and believe what you like there.  But what is under threat, and what Mr Shorten is not telling us, is that religious practice outside the church, mosque or synagogue is under grave threat should the definition of marriage in law be changed.

It certainly looks like the Marxists believe their ‘revolution’ has come about in America as in other western countries.  Social Credit seeks a Resolution of conflict not a Revolution and republishes a letter which appeared in a Social Crediter edition of 1942 .  It is taken from Quadragesimo Anno, the great encyclical on the Reconstruction of the Social Order issued by the late Pope Pius XI.

The letter reads: Sir,

     “The most astonishing comment you will read in a long time, from an Age journalist beaten senseless by identity politics: “The commentator also suggests children are better off being raised by a mother and father, which is incorrect.”       So for thousands of years of human civilisation we have raised children wrong, by forcing them to live with mum and dad.  How could reporter Broede Carmody say something so plainly false, and plainly inspired not by evidence but politics…”

Read further here… http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/the-strangest-sentence-you-will-read-today/news-story/450f59b68cbd0ae0b701898d4ede1bf8

     Last week, it was revealed that females and Indigenous males were being recruited ahead of others in the Australian Defence Force.  As such, it is interesting to hear from a female Aboriginal soldier currently serving in the Australian Army.  She wishes to speak anonymously as she fears for her job. This is not unique. I have spoken to many serving Defence members in recent times who have said exactly the same thing.

This is her story:

     Anarcho-tyranny is here. How will we respond?  Future historians may view the Unite the Right event in Charlottesville as a turning point for the alt-right and the race-realist movement in America.  Before Charlottesville, many of us believed that the government—bound by the First Amendment—would respect our free speech, even if private corporations would fire and blacklist any employee who takes our side.

     Then, on Saturday, we saw the Charlottesville city government ignore a federal court order permitting a pro-white rally, declare the gathering of white activists unlawful, and effectively endorse exactly the type of “heckler’s veto” that the First Amendment forbids. We saw the police forcibly disperse pro-white activists http://www.vdare.com/articles/the-system-revealed-antifa-virginia-politicians-and-police-work-together-to-shut-down-unitetheright  while allowing antifa to violently rampage, throwing bricks, urine, and feces at demonstrators with impunity.  And then, after the pro-whites had been dispersed, when a car struck a crowd of antifa—for reasons still unclear—we saw the entire Establishment media rush to denounce the dissident  movement as a “domestic terrorist organization.”

Source: Breitbart News, 14 August 2017     Google was rocked by the publication of an internal manifesto that alleged wide-ranging political bias within the company. In exclusive interviews with Breitbart News, more Google employees are now speaking out.  The 10-page manifesto, which was met by an immediate backlash, described a climate of fear at the company, in which employees who challenged prevailing leftist narratives on diversity were faced with immediate threats to their career.

     Breitbart News is now exclusively publishing a series of interviews with Google employees who contacted us in the wake of the manifesto’s publication to confirm its allegations.  The interview series, entitled “Rebels of Google,” will be published in full over the coming days. Because every employee who spoke to us fears for their job if their identities were made public, we have provided aliases in place of their real names.

  Ernst Zündel (above, right), with his attorney, Dr. Herbert Schaller, March 1, 2010, just moments after he emerged from Mannheim prison for the first time in five years.

     Ernst Zündel died of heart failure on August 5 at his ancestral home in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany, near Pforzheim, one day before the anniversary of the atomic holocaust in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. He was 78.      He passed away seven years and five months after having served seven years in confinement in Canadian and German prisons for thought crimes committed as a publisher, broadcaster and protestor. To make the inquisition against this German human rights activist palatable to the public, his “crime” is monotonously described as “inciting hatred for years with anti-Semitic activities.”     Read further here: https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com.au/2017/08/ernst-zundel-lover-not-hater.html