Rebels of Google: ‘Senior Leaders Focus on Diversity First and Technology Second

Source: Breitbart News, 14 August 2017     Google was rocked by the publication of an internal manifesto that alleged wide-ranging political bias within the company. In exclusive interviews with Breitbart News, more Google employees are now speaking out.  The 10-page manifesto, which was met by an immediate backlash, described a climate of fear at the company, in which employees who challenged prevailing leftist narratives on diversity were faced with immediate threats to their career.

     Breitbart News is now exclusively publishing a series of interviews with Google employees who contacted us in the wake of the manifesto’s publication to confirm its allegations.  The interview series, entitled “Rebels of Google,” will be published in full over the coming days. Because every employee who spoke to us fears for their job if their identities were made public, we have provided aliases in place of their real names.

Continue reading

Michael Hoffman's obituary for Ernst Zundel


  Ernst Zündel (above, right), with his attorney, Dr. Herbert Schaller, March 1, 2010, just moments after he emerged from Mannheim prison for the first time in five years.

     Ernst Zündel died of heart failure on August 5 at his ancestral home in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany, near Pforzheim, one day before the anniversary of the atomic holocaust in the city of Hiroshima, Japan. He was 78.      He passed away seven years and five months after having served seven years in confinement in Canadian and German prisons for thought crimes committed as a publisher, broadcaster and protestor. To make the inquisition against this German human rights activist palatable to the public, his “crime” is monotonously described as “inciting hatred for years with anti-Semitic activities.”     Read further here: https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com.au/2017/08/ernst-zundel-lover-not-hater.html

Continue reading

The War On Cars by Wallace Klinck


     There is a heavy ideological content, often accompanied by financial incentive, in the program for moving toward so-called “Green” modes of transportation.  These involve costs which generally are not openly publicized or often not even considered by some of these enthusiasts and/or demagogues, and freedom of choice in movement is usually a victim of these centrist programs which typically include increasingly exclusive schemes for mass transport by prescribed conditions and routes.

     I believe that there is good reason to suspect that especially militant proponents of such schemes are at least as motivated by envy and hatred of human freedom as they are about responsible use of the earth’s resources.  They probably feel empowered to the extent that they are able to control the actions of other citizens.  This is the “Will-to-Power” in action and manifests as domination and control by intimidation through rampant legalism inspired by equalitarian dogma and which goes far beyond realistic practical considerations of necessity and provides a weapon for ideological tyrants who conjure apocalyptic visions of universal scarcity and disaster to terrorize their victims into submission.  

Continue reading

What is Social Credit?


Someone has posted this simple animated brief video to Youtube a short time ago.  It seems to be quite sound and provides full text as well as audio--and obviously has been “borrowed” by a well-intended person.

Seven in 10 Americans Support the Right to Legal Abortion

     Daily Kos <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.> wrote:Wallace, seven in 10 Americans support the right to legal abortion. The Supreme Court has upheld our constitutional right to choose. Still, we’re forced to defend it repeatedly as anti-choice politicians and organizations focus on undermining our rights and chipping away at access until they eliminate it completely. As long as the right to abortion is endangered, human rights are threatened.

To which Wallace Klinck Responded:  Monique Teal (Daily Kos)     Our “economic viability” is primarily determined, and sabotaged, by a dysfunctional, exploitative and costive financial system which is increasingly non-distributive, except by means of exponentially increasing financial debt, and which stops up the potential abundance of nations.  If you prefer to ignore this final and definitive cause of our problems of poverty, crime, war, etc., and instead choose to encourage women to destroy the life within them without humanity, emotion or moral concern, you are hopelessly confused, and culpable if actually aware of the destructive and degrading nature of your actions, which seem to assume that women, along with the rest of humanity, are primarily and inevitably mere economic functionaries serving the powers of Mammon, as embodied in the banking and financial fraternity.  You are basing your policies upon fear and avarice rather than upon faith, love and compassion.  We live in a world of actual abundance and financial scarcity, and are deceived by the latter to believe in a material scarcity which does not exist except for the inhibiting influence of its false symbolic accountancy representation and determinant, which we call money.  An increasing portion of the world’s human “work” is done not for any genuinely or justifiable productive purpose but rather merely to receive financial incomes enabling us to obtain not current but past production.  This is called “salvation through works”—and the “works” (defined as expended human energy) become evermore irrelevant, wasteful, idolatrous, enslaving and threatening as technology replaces human energy as a factor of production.  The crime is not the marvellous displacement of labour by technology but in our inability, or mindless and stubborn unwillingness, to provide a means for dispersion of the spectacular abundance which technology makes possible.  A nation or society which has no Cultural Inheritance, or refuses to recognize, acknowledge and confer it, is doomed for consignment to the scrapheap of history.Major C.H. Douglas on “Causes of War” - part 1 - YouTube - BBC 1934  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw28HmmvNNs

Continue reading

The Creative Ac-counting OF THE TEMPERATURE RECORDS

     I understand that if I ‘doctored’ the books of a company I would/could be charged with fraud… it is a criminal offence.  But what about the ‘doctoring’ of weather details by the Bureau of Meteorology, a taxpayer funded institution?  It seems that doesn’t count as a fraud.

     Do listen to Alan Jones’ interviewing Dr. Jennifer Marohasy on the ‘doctoring’ of the weather temperature details….  Appalling! http://www.2gb.com/podcast/dr-jennifer-marohasy/

THE ‘NEW AGE’ WAS UPON US LAST CENTURY

     It seems it is finally hitting this generation. The Age of Human Labour is fast fading, the Age of Robotic Automation has dawned.  The headlines read:

     "Future of work: How your job will change by 2030”-- 27 July7, 2017:

Continue reading

THE ABC OF SOCIAL CREDIT

     “If Industry’s objective is more efficiently carried out by the use of machinery, automation and now robots, than by the use of man-power, then we must expect a progressive increase in unemployment.”  That was understood in the early years of the 20th century.      What about now in the early years of the 21st century?  The issues have become more pressing. Elizabeth Holter published a little book in 1934 explaining in simple terms what she understood as “The ABC of Social Credit”.  As she explained in the Introduction, the past few hundred years have seen the transformation of the world.  Before James Watt invented the first practical steam engine, the struggle for existence required all man’s time and energies and scarcity and want was never far removed, and always to be reckoned with.  And then ‘scarcity in an age of plenty’ loomed large because mankind had not grasped the dramatic changes that had taken place and his systems/institutions were based on policies originating in an earlier age.

     But we are now in the early part of the 21st century and with the Robotic Revolution and the growing Precariat (precarious unemployed and ever-growing personal and national debt)) there are those who are putting forward ideas on how to provide a Basic Income, and/or Positive Money for all citizens.

Continue reading

THE CHARTISTS FROM A SOCIAL CREDIT VIEWPOINT

     Watched the videos on the Institute of Public Affairs website by Dr. Bella on Australia’s The British Heritage of our Freedoms.  The videos are well worth watching.   Found here… https://ipa.org.au/heritage-of-our-freedoms

     The video “Australia’s own Tea Party Revolution” was of great interest to me.  It dealt with the role of a group of Chartists “on the Victorian gold fields in the 1850s and the demands they made following the Eureka Stockade…”Regular readers and supporters of ALoR journals and website would be very familiar with such discussions as Magna Carta; The Rule of Law; English (Common) Law; etc., so I thought I should search through The Social Crediter to see what C.H. Douglas had to say about the Chartists.The following is what I found in The Social Crediter, Vol.7, No.2, 31st January 1942Writing of Karl Marx, Major Douglas quotes historian Nesta Webster:

Continue reading

The Translation of “Quadragesimo Anno” Also of Great Interest

     Sir,The difference of opinion between H. E. Cardinal Villeneuve and the social crediters of Quebec revealed in the Montreal journal vers Demain presents an opportunity not to be missed.There are two passages in Quadragesimo Anno, the great encyclical on the Reconstruction of the Social Order issued by the late Pope Pius XI, which are of great importance in dealing with uninformed criticism from members of the Catholic Church.

     From paragraph 75 of the Latin version, the English translation reads,

Continue reading

Social Credit Exposed The Scam Last Century by Wallace Klinck


     It is tragic to observe society again being swept up in the false and fabricated Left-Right dialectic as the Banking Fraternity continues to dominate from its safe abode hidden above the storm--centralizing both wealth and power all the while in its megalomaniacal drive for World Dominion.  

     Social Credit exposed this scam in the early part of the last century and provided the appropriate recommendations to eliminate the prevailing system of continuing and exponentially expanding financial debt.  Communism/socialism and fascism both build up from the State rather than from the individual.

Continue reading

SOME IMPORTANT WARNINGS FROM THE PAST

The Supreme State, Planning and Scarcity: On Target 25 July 2014

“We are at the present time unquestionably under the domination of a financial system, which rules us. It rules us in our most basic necessities; the necessity for bed, board and clothes, and the other things that go to make up the standard of living. But we do not want to transfer that domination from, let us say, what we can call the banking system under another name to something we call the State. The great danger at the present time is not that the present financial system will persist ... but that under the confusion that will exist as a result of the crises caused by the breakdown of the financial system, an even greater tyranny may be put over on you as in the cases of many countries at the present time, and which is in active progress in still more countries even as I speak. That is the danger, and you must keep in your minds, to avoid that danger, some clear objective, and that objective, the proper relationship of the individual to the group, is in my opinion, the relationship and objective to which we want to strive….” - - From a speech by Major C.H. Douglas at Calgary, Alberta, Canada, April, 1934. https://alor.org/Library/ThoughtsofDouglas.htm

INDEPENDENT’S PROPOSAL: MORE SOCIALISM BY STEALTH?

     So, the news has filtered down to the UK’s newspaper The Independent that Canada is considering a Basic Income for the nation’s ‘precariats’.  Paid for out of taxation of course – you know, tax the rich to pay the poor - not created by a National Credit Office and issued debt free, as proposed by Social Credit concepts.

“Unlike its neighbour the United States, Canada projects an image of peace, plenty and progressive policies. But there’s a quiet rumble across the North American country. While the rest of the world is in love with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, his popularity ratings at home are down 9 per cent on last year. Income inequality is acute and unemployment is still stubbornly high. What new work that is being created in Canada’s economy is precarious and part-time. Wage rises are being eaten away at by inflation since the financial crisis and millions of jobs are at risk from automation.

Continue reading

WHAT ABOUT THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL ?

Eric D. Butler wrote:

“If, as we are told in the New Testament, the love of money is the root of all evil, why then, at a time when Christian Civilisation is clearly disintegrating, do so few of those who claim to speak in the name of Christianity, devote themselves to a realistic consideration of this warning?Christ was emphatic that it was impossible to worship both God and Mammon, that no one could serve two masters, and in the only act of physical violence during His Ministry, whipped the money changers out of the Temple.

Continue reading

THE NEW BARBARISM by Eric D. Butler, On Target 28 August 1998

     The lessons of history are clear for all those who read them. But these lessons must be learnt, and acted upon, if ever there is to be peace on earth. The faster the growth of centralised power, the greater the social dislocations and violence. The faster the growth of violence at all levels throughout the world, the faster the retreat from civilisation.- - Eric D. Butler

We are republishing an article Eric D. Butler wrote in 1998.  But of course I can remember him sounding such warnings much earlier than 1998. Having absorbed Clifford Hugh Douglas’ analysis of Christian philosophy and history, Eric could see what was happening to the present western world.  Read on:

Continue reading

AUSTRALIA’S ETERNAL POLITICAL CRISIS by James Reed, 2014

     Paul Kelly, The Australian’s “editor-at-large” (whatever that means – is there an “editor-at-small”), tells us that Australia’s political culture “is noisy, egotistical, destructive and consumed by self-interest”. (The Australian 2 July 2014, p.16) “The trajectory of Australia’s relative decline now seems set” and the political malaise “might only deepen under the Abbott prime ministership”.  The problem is the inability of the political system to respond to society’s needs – and this is common right across the West, Kelly tells us. The problems are at root philosophical: a culture of complaint, the decline of self-reliance, the belief that virtually any hardship is the fault of government”, are some of the problems.

     The League has been saying this and more for some time, indeed, a long time. The political system has got increasingly worse and basically has ceased to function as it was intended to do. Clearly we are at the “crossroads” and we may have to accept that “Australia” as we knew it is now dead for us and that we need to start building anew. It’s like an old orange tree that my folks had. The tree died, but some time later a new tree sprang up and grew around the old dead wood. The old wood eventually was no more.

THE BEST ENEMY MONEY CAN BUY

     I believe it important Australians study very carefully just how modern governments have been betraying their own peoples for at least the last century. The answer could be in the following story of Western Capitalism and the former Soviet Union that you have never read.

     This business of lending blood money is one of the most thoroughly sordid, cold blooded, and criminal acts that was ever carried to any considerable extent, amongst human beings. It is like lending money to slave traders, or to common robbers and pirates, to be repaid out of their plunder. And the man who loans money to governments, so called, for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob, enslave and murder their people, are among the greatest villains that the world has ever seen.  -- Lysander Spooner, “No Treason” (Boston, 1870)

Continue reading

Letter to The Editor - DEPENDS ON ONE’S VERSION OF ‘HISTORY’

Letter published in The Australian, 6/7/17      “I am bewildered by Bob Carr’s attack on “Israel’s foul occupation” (5/7/17). Just with whom can Israel negotiate a two-state solution?  Or does Carr support the ambitions of Hamas, which controls Gaza, to drive every last Israeli to drown in the sea?  As for Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian territory on the West Bank, he has not held elections in the past twelve years, and his hold on power is tenuous at best. Furthermore, he speaks out of both sides of his mouth: while assuring a succession of US Presidents that he is willing to negotiate a two-state solution, he always backs out by imposing unacceptable pre-conditions, such as the “right of return” of generations of Palestinian refugees to Israel which would demographically swamp the Jewish state.      I suggest that instead of grand-standing at ALP conferences, Bob Carr appoint himself as conciliator-in-chief and see if he can bring Hamas and Abbas to a negotiating table with Benjamin Netanyahu, the current Prime Minister of Israel.”Babette Francis, Toorak, Vic.

To Which Wallace Klinck of Canada Responded:     “I am afraid that Babette seems naively and seriously to misperceive the overall situation.  “Israel” does not “negotiate” with anyone.  It holds to a megalomaniacal messianic world vision as its destiny and only makes demands which serve this end.  A two-state “solution” is impossible because the second state rapidly would be bullied, destroyed and absorbed into the “Greater Israel” Middle East project.  A single state is impossible because Israel will never accede to co-operate with alien elements in a unitary government which soon would become dominated by non-Jewish elements.

Continue reading

Donald Trump just ended a tradition of celebrating Ramadan at the White House

     In the US, for the first time in two decades, the White House has not recognised the Muslim holiday Ramadan, unlike the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations, which did recognise it. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said the State Department would break with tradition and not host a Ramadan reception (thewashingtonpost 25/6/17).to which Wallace Klinck from Canada explained:     Well, recognition by the State could well be interpreted as an endorsement by Government.  If that is to be accorded then in all “fairness” it should be done for every other “religion” large or small even if entirely incompatible and at odds with one another—or with the larger society or the State itself.  The problem is, of course, that when different groups of people find “realities” which are not compatible but all claim, honestly or otherwise, to be correct—how do you accommodate this chaotic situation?  I think that it is fairly safe to say that in final analysis there is only one “reality”—but what mortal human is qualified to render a conclusive judgement on the matter?  We who have developed within and from an overwhelmingly “Christian" background seem to have produced with great historic faith, effort and dedication the most advanced societies and I think that we would be very foolish to abandon this achievement to the demands of minorities or foreign migrants, promoted and encouraged through subterfuge by hostile elements, domestic and foreign, who are skilled in exploiting our “tolerance” and “fairness” for their own ends.  Obviously, I am biased toward the Christian concept of life because I think that, although it has by no means been adequately followed and has had its own dark moments in history, it has in balance produced through its unique emphasis on individual freedom by far the most desirable conditions for humans.  Nominally, at least, and historically, it is overwhelmingly the dominant belief system in our part of the world and I think that wisdom requires that we should retain it in our continuing, but increasingly threatened, free and open quest for truth, in its broadest interpretation, as the only known sound foundation upon which to construct civilization.

     Organic change effected by constant contact with the real world and universe is both inevitable and entirely desirable—but we should resist sudden and/or radical social upheaval engineered by hidden and secretive forces bent on overthrowing millennia of development for their own self-serving ideological, political and economic agenda.  So far as Islam is concerned, aside from the undeniable merits of some of its individual members, it is as a collectivity both ideologically and politically militant and fundamentally incompatible with our civilization and I think that the two belief systems should remain in their own regions of the globe to demonstrate to themselves and to the world what they can achieve.  Islam has nothing essential to offer the West and we are under no obligation whatsoever to extend to it an opportunity of occupation and inevitable conquest through the means of its high birth rate alone.  We already have erred fatally by succumbing to the inimical policies of another group which is very small in number but exercises by deceptive means and subterfuge an influence that is thoroughly out of proportion to its numerical presence.       In my opinion, politicians who compromise the interests of their nations either by bending to wealthy and powerful minority interests or by promoting an influx of foreign peoples for the intended purpose of securing an expanded electoral base are guilty of betraying their nations and are the basest of people, devoted to the quest of power and devoid of morals or ethics.  One wonders, of course, what this may have to say about the people who repeatedly vote them into office.The people perish for want of knowledge.

THE PYNE/TURNBULL BETRAYAL OF CONSERVATIVE VALUES

I have simply changed certain words in the following article from those of Ivor Benson’s where he explained former PM Ian Smith’s betrayal of his Rhodesian people and nation. Benson asked the question:

How else are we to explain the dazed incomprehension with which the rank and file members of the Liberal Party, even members of parliament, even cabinet ministers, looked on as one by one all those ‘evil geniuses’, genuine opponents of the socialist world revolution, were defamed, tricked, driven out of the party, or in some other way deprived of any influence?

Continue reading